What I won’t be seeing this weekend

IMDB’s home page today was touting a new movie called Evening which is apparently opening this weekend. From its description:

“As Ann Lord (Vanessa Redgrave) lies dying, with her daughters Constance (Natasha Richardson) and Nina (Toni Collette) at her bedside, she calls out the name of a man, Harris.”

I did not have to read any farther to be able to tell that I do not want to see this movie. We all have our different ways of judging books by their covers, and movies by their trailers, and quite often these little methods are reliable. There are some notable exceptions: most action movie trailers look a little on the ridiculous side, you have to be sensitive enough to pick up the little indicators of which of these will be even more stupid than they look, and which will turn out to be pretty good.

I believe the classic example may be The Matrix: I think most people were probably led astray by the obvious Keanu Reeves red herring, and most of us had to eat our words when the actual movie came out.

With the description of Evening, however, I have identified a genre of movies which I would not enjoy and have no interest in seeing. These are movies in which someone is dead or dying and their surviving relatives learn of some stupid short-lived romantic encounter which either Changed Everything or Failed to Change Everything in some painfully dull way. Examples of such movies which I have not seen include (in addition to the above example) The English Patient, The Bridges of Madison County, and Titanic. Reportedly, these exponents of the genre vary widely in their quality and themes, but I’m just not interested in seeing any of them. Ever.

So you won’t be seeing any reviews of these movies by me. Or, maybe you just did.

Tags: , , , , ,
Posted in Movies |
View more at http://imdb.com/title/tt0765447/
Angry Teti

By Angry Teti
June 27th, 2007

One movie of that general genre that might be worth taking a look at is Big Fish. It’s not my favorite Tim Burton movie, but it has a lot of great performances. If you can get past the nagging feeling that a lot of the quirkiness is just for the sake of quirkiness, there’s a lot of good to be found there.

Also, Billy Crudup is great and not in nearly enough movies.

Vendar on June 28th, 2007 at 8:28 am

I saw “The English Patient” in theaters. I loathed it with the intensity of a thousand suns.

I did just read a good book (Possession by AS Byatt) that more or less fits the exact genre you justly deride. But it was good, really it was!

Byzantine on June 28th, 2007 at 10:09 am

[…] 1. It has Brad Pitt in it 2. It has a really stupid name 3. It has Brad Pitt doing a stupid fake southern accent in it 4. I have to “click to download” something to watch the trailer (which i don’t want to watch) 5. The old/young version of Brad Pitt is incredibly creepy and unnerving, in a bad way 6. It appears to contain one of the stupid/boring romantic encounters that Changed Everything, that I hate so much 7. A movie with Brad Pitt in it opening on Christmas is liable to ruin Christmas 8. Tagline: “Life isn’t measured in minutes, but in moments.” I literally gagged 9. A movie with Brad Pitt in it that also contains Cate Blanchett is liable to ruin Cate Blanchett 10. It just looks stupid and ridiculous and soppy and pointless and represents everything inane about American popular culture and it makes me sad just thinking about it […]

Pizappa » Blog Archive » Reasons not to watch The Curious Case of Benjamin Button on December 4th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

Your turn ... Click here to leave a reply

.